Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36152 (KAR)

SMT LAKSHMAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/33884/2024 · 2025-07-16

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26283 WP No. 33884 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 33884 OF 2024 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT MAADAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-562 125. 2. SRI. MURALIDHAR S/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT MAADAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-562 125. 3. SRI. BHADRAIAH S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT MAADAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-562 125. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVINDRA BABU.K.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ENERGY DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO.236, 2ND FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26283 WP No. 33884 of 2024 2. THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM), REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT K.R.CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (AEE), OFFICE OF THE AEE ATTIBELE SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY, SARJAPURA ROAD, ATTIBELE-562 107. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER (AE), SARJAPUR O AND M UNIT, BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU -562 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA FOR R1; SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO 4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Ravindra Babu.K.C., counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Rajakumar.M., AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.H.V.Devaraju., counsel for respondents 2 to 4 have appeared in person. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26283 WP No. 33884 of 2024 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs: a. Issue a Writ or order direction in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the orders/ notice dated:04/10/2024 passed by respondent No.3 vide Annexures-A, A1 and A2 respectively, by allowing the above Writ Petition; b. Direct respondents 3 and 4 authority to restore the disconnected electricity connection to the petitioners properties as prayed under this petition. c. To grant such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 3. Suffice it to note that the BESCOM Authority issued a Communication to the petitioners on 04.10.2024 intimating the petitioners to furnish the documents pertaining to renewal of license within three days, failing which they would take steps to disconnect the power supply. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26283 WP No. 33884 of 2024 Counsel Sri.H.V.Devaraju., submits that the petitioners may be directed to submit a suitable reply and the authority would consider the same in accordance with the law. Counsel, therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel Sri.H.V.Devaraju., is placed on record. The petitioners are directed to submit their reply to the communication within two weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. Upon receipt of the reply, the authority concerned shall consider the same in accordance with the law. By virtue of the interim order dated:20.12.2024, the electricity power connection was restored. The BESCOM Authority shall not precipitate the matter to disconnect the power supply till the consideration of the reply that would be submitted by the petitioners. Needless to observe the petitioners shall pay the regular consumption charges. 4. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26283 WP No. 33884 of 2024 This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13