BOKARO STEEL PLANT v. THEIR WORKMAN REP.BY BOKARO PR
WPC/1716/2009 · 2025-10-30
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36151 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36151 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (L) No. 1716 of 2009 Bokaro Steel Plant ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner
Versus Their Workman represented by Bokaro Progressive Front, Bokaro Steel City and others … … ... Respondents
WITH
W.P. (L) No. 3585 of 2009 Bokaro Progressive Front ... ... ... ... Petitioner
Versus Employer in relation to the Management of Bokaro Steel Plant (SAIL)
… … ... Respondent
--------- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
--------- W.P. (L) No. 1716 of 2009 For the Petitioner: Mr. Saket Upadhyay, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Saibal Kumar Laik, Advocate W.P. (L) No. 3585 of 2009 For the Petitioner: Mr. Saibal Kumar Laik, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Saket Upadhyay, Advocate
--------- 39/Dated: 20.11.2025
There appears to be a typographical error in paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 30th October 2025, inasmuch, instead of the year ‘2009’, it has wrongly been mentioned as ‘2019’, in the description given for W.P. (L) No.1716 of 2009.
Paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 30th October 2025 be rectified to that extent.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
November 20, 2025
Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.1