Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36148 (PNJ)

RAJINDER SHARMA v. M/S LACKSON LUBRICANTS AND ANR.

CRR/1252/2007 · 2025-04-29

Sumeet Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CRR-1252-2007 (O&M) Decided on : 29.04.2025 Rajinder Sharma ……Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Lackson Lubricants and another ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sagar Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Inderjeet Singh Ladher, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.2. ***** Sumeet Goel (Oral): 1. Learned counsel for the State of Punjab, while relying upon the report dated 20.04.2025 prepared by the concerned SHO, has submitted that whereabouts of the petitioner are not known despite diligent efforts. He further submits that the report is in Punjabi language and translated copy thereof shall be filed in accordance with rules in the Registry within a period of 7 working days from today. Permission is accorded 2. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is being repeatedly called upon, through the concerned SHO, to enter appearance but to no avail. It appears from the factual milieu of the case that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the petition in hand. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. The concerned trial Court is mandated to take requisite further steps in accordance with law. (SUMEET GOEL) April 29, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No JATIN 2025.04.29 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document