Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36148 (PAT)

Md. Sakil @ Md. Shakeel v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./24263/2025 · 2025-05-01

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24263 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2024 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1. Md. Sakil @ Md. Shakeel S/o Md. Mujahir Ansari Resident of Village- Simiyahi, P.S.- Sursand, Distt.- Sitamarhi 2. Md. Fahimuddin Ansari @ Chhote S/o Md. Mujahir Ansari Resident of Village- Simiyahi, P.S.- Sursand, Distt.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Dispute over share in compensation amount led to Maarpeet between informant and petitioners, in which, it is alleged that these petitioners assaulted informant with iron rod causing injury on his head. It is further alleged that petitioner no. 1 took out Rs. 20,000/- from pocket of informant and when his wife came to rescue, she was also assaulted and threatened. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24263 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/2 informant and petitioners are full brothers. Case and counter case. Counter case has been lodged by father of these petitioners against the informant. Injuries, sustained by informant, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T