Motamarri Surya Kameswara Rao, v. Mallela Veera Raghava,
AS/857/2010 · 2025-07-10
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36145 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36145 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010587152010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3368] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 857/2010
Between:
1. MOTAMARRI SURYA KAMESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE APPARARAO, HINDU, R/O. DR.NO. 5-16-6/7, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
2. MOTAMARRI RAVEENDRA KUMAR,, S/O. M. SURYA KAMESWARA RAO, HINDU, R/O. DR.NO. 5-16-6/7, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
3. MOTAMARRI SRINIVASA MOHAN RAO,, S/O. M. SURYA KAMESWARA RAO, HINDU, R/O. DR.NO. 5-16-6/7, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
4. MOTAMARRI VENKATAMANIKYAM,, W/O. SATYENDRA KUMAR, HINDU, R/O. DR.NO. 5-16-6/7, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
5. MOTAMARRI KRANTHI KUMAR,, S/O. SATYENDRA KUMAR, HINDU, R/O. DR.NO. 5-16-6/7, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM. (AMENDED AS PER THE ORDERS OF THE HONOURABLE COURT
6. MOTAMARRI BHAVANI,, D/O. SATYENDRA KUMAR, HINDU, R/O. DR.NO. 5-16-6/7, SRINIVASA NAGAR, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM. (AMENDED AS PER THE ORDERS OF THE HONOURABLE COURT
...APPELLANT(S)
2 AND
1. MALLELA VEERA RAGHAVA, S/o. Visweswara Rao, Hindu, R/o. Dr. No. MIG 63, VUDA Colon, Madhavadara, Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. I GOPAL REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K V UDAYA BHASKER
3 The Court made the following Judgment:
Sri S.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the appellant Nos.1 & 2 are no more and inspite of his best efforts, the legal representatives of the deceased appellant Nos.1 & 2 and appellant Nos.3 to 6 are not coming forward to prosecute the appeal and hence, necessary orders may be rendered in this appeal.
2. No representation for the respondent.
3. In that view of the matter, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 11.07.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 857of 2010
Date: 11.07.2025 PSA