IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30710 OF 2024 Between; K y N Enterprises, 26/930-3, Mittamadi Street, Proddutur, Kadapa District, Rep. by its>Proprietrix, Kotapadu Venkata Narasamma, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Endowments Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Velaqapudi Guntur District, ’ 2. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada. 3. Sri Maddileti Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam, R.S. Rangapuram Village, Bethamcherla Mandal, Nandyal District. Rep by its Executive Officer. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conducting public auction for lease hold rights for collection of human hair for a period of one year pursuant to the direction issued by the 2nd respondent through L.Dis.No.DI/COE/14025(34)/77/2024, dated 5.11.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, biased, malafide and in violation of Articles 14 and 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and direct the 3'^^ respondent to conduct public auction for leasing of rights for collection of human hair for a period of one year from the 3rd respondent- Devasthanam. may consequently r lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2^^ respondent not to act upon the letter dated 14.11.2024 addressed by the respondent for giving lease hold rights for collection of human hair for a period of one year pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VV N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G. RAMANA RAO, SC FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following order: r' APHC010587942024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30710/2024 Between: K V N Enterprises ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVN NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) 2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief;- “...to issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conducting public auction for lease hold rights for collection of human hair for a period of one year pursuant to the direction issued by the 2nd through L Dis. No. DI/COE/14025(34)/77/2024, dated 5.11.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, biased, malafide and in violation of Articles 14 and 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and conseguently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct public auction for leasing of rights for collection of human hair for a period of one year from the 3rd respondent-Devasthanam and to pass...” respondent \ Aggrieved by the action of the 3'^'^ respondent in not conducting public auction for lease hold rights for collection of human hair for a period of one year pursuant to the direction issued by the 2'^'^ respondent vide L.Dis.No.D1/COE/14025(34)/77/2024, dated 05.11.2024 Executive Director of the subject devasthanam was directed to conduct e- tender, sealed tender and public auction afresh by giving wide publicity and by following the procedure as per rules, the petitioner has filed the present petition. 2. \ wherein the 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Endowments. Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel has produced a copy of instructions of the 3'^'^ respondent herein dated 28.12.2024, wherein it is stated that the 3'^'^ respondent has conducted the auction for the lease hold rights for collection of human hair for five times through e-tender, but, however, they were postponed on various reasons. Ultimately, the auction was held on 15.10.2024 wherein the 4. ▼ petitioner has also participated in the said auction and one Sri. J. Chinna Srinu was declared as the highest bidder for lease hold rights for collection of human hair for the period 16.10.2024 to 15.10.2025. In view of the fact that the lease hold rights for collection of human hair were already issued in favour of Sri. J. Chinna Srinu, Proddutur, Y.S.R. District, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause survives in the present writ petition. 5. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR closed. //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to Sri VV N Narayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri G. Ramana Rao, SC for Endowments [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2025 ORDER ' ^ g I 0 MAR 20?5 Current Section . WP.No.3071 Oof 2024 M CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS