Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 703 OF 2011 Appeal Under Section 30 of Workmen Compensation Act, against the orders dt.11.04.2011 in W.C.No.3 of 2008 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation & Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. Between: K.Kuppa, S/o.K.Venkataiah, Aged about 40 years, OcciCleaner R/o.Rajiv Nagar Panchayat, Jeevakona, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...Appellant AND
1. Smt.G.Girija W/o.Purushotham Owner of Mahindra Jeep No.AP 03 V 7155 R/o.Narasingapura Village and Post, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District.
2. M/s.National Insruance Co Ltd, rep by its Branch Manager Pedakapu Layout, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant :SRI. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI. VUPPALAPATI SRINIVAS RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI. SRIMAN The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
.e ,t APHC010587672011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 703/2011 [3460] Between: K.kuppa ...APPELLANT AND Smt G Girija Anr and Others Counsel for the Appellant:
1.0 UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.VUPPALAPATI SRI NIVAS RAJU 2.SRIMAN The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT{S)
¥ HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.M.A.No.703 of 2011
JUDGMENT: This Appeal is filed questioning the order dated 11.04.2011 in W.C.No.3 of 2008 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that he has no instructions from the appellant and a memo was also filed to that
2. effect. In view of the same, it appears that the Appellant is not
3. Therefore, this Court is left interested in prosecuting the case. with no option but to dismiss the revision for non-prosecution. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for
4. As a sequel, the non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation & Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Tirupathi, Chittoor District (with records)
2. One CC to Sri. O Udaya Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri. SRIMAN Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri. Vuppalapati Srinivas Raju Advocate [OPUC]
5. The Section Officer, V R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi.
6. Three CD Copies PR PRK
HIGH COURT DATED:04/02/2025
ORDER CMA.No.703 of 2011 X 22 APR ^ . Currem aecuon N^fSPATCV'^?'^ a DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUTCOSTS