[2023:RJ-JD:19885] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Writ Contempt No. 984/2018 1. Anil Mathur S/o Shri Pyare Lal Mathur, Aged About 53 Years, P.no. 408, Ligh Scheme No. 1, Nandanvan, Chopasani Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 2. Rajendra Dave S/o Shri Deen Dayal Dave, Aged About 56 Years, Mansagar, Mahamandir, Jodhpur Rajasthan 3. Prem Raj Khanna S/o Shri Girdhari Lal Khanna, Aged About 57 Years, Jk Nursing Home, Sardarpura, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 4. Niraj Shah S/o Shri Naveen Chand Shah, Aged About 45 Years, C/o Office Of District Transport Officer, Pratapgarh, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan 5. Nain Singh Sodha S/o Shri Vishan Singh Sodha, Aged About 54 Years, Laxmi Nagar, Jail Road, Barmer, Rajasthan 6. Khem Singh S/o Shri Udai Singh, Aged About 57 Years, Near Idukhan Chakki, Ganga Mata Mandir Ki Gali, Abu Road, District Sirohi, Rajasthan 7. Rajiv Tyagi S/o Shri Tara Chand, Aged About 52 Years, C/o Office Of The District Transport Officer, Jalore, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus Shri Db Gupta, Finance Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Uttam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Shah, Sr. Advocate, AAG assisted by Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Mr. Sudhit Tak, AAG with Mr. Navneet Singh Birkh JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 05/07/2023 1. Mr. Shah, learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent – State submits that due compliance of the order, non-compliance whereof has been alleged, has been [2023:RJ-JD:19885] (2 of 2) [WCP-984/2018] made and actual payment has been made to one of the petitioners. 2. He submits that as five of the petitioners have since been retired, certain formalities are required to be done, which can only be done on receiving service books of the petitioners. 3. It is assured that the requisite payment shall be made to the petitioners within a period of three months from today. The photocopy of the orders dated 16.05.2023 and 02.06.2023 placed for Court’s perusal are taken on record. 4. In view of the submission so made, the notices of contempt are, hereby, discharged. 5. The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes. 6. Needless to observe that if any of the grievance of the petitioner(s) still persists, they shall be free to move an application for revival of the present contempt petition or file fresh contempt petition. (DINESH MEHTA),J 147-Arvind/-