IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 20404/2025 Decided on: 30.12.2025 Raj Mal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Ravinder Singh Rana Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 in order to earn pension by computing contractual service rendered by him followed by regularization. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance raised in the writ petition. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No.9084/2023, decided on 18.12.2025 a/w connected matters 2 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring his representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 30th December, 2025(rohit)