2025:JHHC:11414 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 21 of 2022 ----- Sapana Devi @ Sapana Kumari, w/o Late Sanju Pradhan, R/o Village Besrajara, P.O. & P.S. Kolebira, District- Simdega, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand 3.Director General of Police, Jharkhand Ranchi 4.The Deputy Commissioner, Simdega 5.The Superintendent of Police, Simdega, Jharkhand 6.The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), through its Director, office at 6th Floor, Lodhi Roaid, Plot No.5-9, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi … Respondent(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Vinod Kumar Sahu, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Abhi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Devesh Krishna, S.C. Mines-III Ms. Vaibhav Joshi, AC to S.C. Mines-III For the Resp-CBI : Mr. Prashand Pallav, Spl. P.P. …...... 10 / 15.04.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. Heard, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 3. Petitioner in this writ petition, has prayed for a direction upon the respondent to investigate Kolebira P.S. Case No.03 of 2022 dated 04.01.2022 in a proper manner. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the matter relates to death of Sanju Pradhan, the husband of the petitioner, for which the aforesaid case was registered under Section 147, 148, 149, 364, 302 and 201 of IPC. It is her case, the F.I.R. was against more than 100 unknown persons and 13 named persons and the respondents are not investigating the matter properly. 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that investigating has been completed and all the 13 named persons have been chargesheeted. He further submits that the other unknown persons are not traceable and cannot be identified properly, so no action has been taken. 2025:JHHC:11414 6. Considering the fact that the chargesheet has already been submitted in this case, I am not inclined to proceed any further in this writ petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved and is of the opinion that there are other persons who are involved in the occurrence, he may file an appropriate application before the Trial Court where the evidence is being led now. 7. With the aforesaid discussion, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./