APHC010587322018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27872/2018 Between: 1. M.PADMA, W/O CHANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER, ROUTHLAPUDI, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, CENTRE CODE NO.24, SANKAVARAM PROJECT, 2. N.SANTHI KUMARI, W/O DEVULLU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, MINI ANGANWADI WORKER, MASAMPALLY, CENTRE CODE.197, SANKAVARAM PROJECT. 3. K.BABY, W/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, MINI ANGANWADI WORKER, JALADHAM, SANKAVARAM PROJECT. 4. K.SATYAVATHI, W/O RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, MINI ANGANWADI WORKER, SARLANKA, SANKAVARAM PROJECT. 5. CH.RAJESWARI, W/O APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, MINI ANGANWADI WORKER, SIDDIVARIPALEM, SANKAVARAM PROJECT. 6. D.APPALA RAJAMMA, W/O LOVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, ANGANWADI HELPER, SIRIPURAM CODE NO.3, SANKAVARAM PROJECT. 7. B.RAJAMANI, W/O RAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ANGANWADI HELPER, THOTAPALLI, CENTRE CODE NO.217, SANKAVARAM PROJECT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,. WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, WOMAN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPT., SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S. PROJECT, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, I.C.D.S. PROJECT, SANKHAVARAM, SANKHAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B GEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the notification No.72/A/2018 dt.18.7.2018 issued by the 4th Respondent herein notifying the post of Anganwadi workers/Helpers and Mini Anganwadi Workers in respect of Sankavaram project against the centres of the writ petitioners as stated in the Annexure as being illegal, arbitrary and in gross violation of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 335 of the Constitution of India.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.B.Geeta, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, no further orders are required as the matter has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27872 of 2018 Dt.28.03.2025 Dinesh