( 2025:HHC:35882 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16842/2025 Decided on: 29.10.2025 Dinesh Singh …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Narendra Guleria, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks decision of his representation dated 05.06.2025 ( Annexure P-6) in accordance with law as his grievance is that aforesaid representation has not been decided by the respondents till date. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 ( 2025:HHC:35882 ) representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 29th October, 2025(yogesh)