MD NISAR MIAN @ MD NISAR MIRZA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./7290/2025 · 2025-12-19
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36100 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36100 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:38181 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.7290 of 2025
1 Md. Nisar Mian @ Md. Nisar Mirza, aged about 61 years, S/O Late Nijam Mirja 2 Nawaj Mirja @ Md. Nisar Alam @ Md. Nisar Alam Mirja, S/o Md. Nisar Mirja, both resident of Bishanpur, aged about 32 years P.O and P.S. Pachamba, District-Giridih. 3 Nasim Rayeen @ Rasu @ Md. Nasim Rayeen, aged about 44 years S/o Md. Nasim Rayeen, resident of Kunjra, Patti Road, Pachamba, P.O and P.S. Pachamba, District-Giridih.
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Uttam Kumar Das, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P. ------
2/19.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pachamba P.S. case No. 130 of 2024, for an alleged offence U/s 189(2)/126(2)/115(2)/109/324(4)/308(2)/303(2) of B.N.S.2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that false allegations are made of extortion of money. He next submits that there is land dispute between the parties and Section 144 Cr.P.C. proceeding was also initiated. He further submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 18 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of extortion.
5. Considering that Annexure-2 is the document, which is a power of attorney, which is in favour of the petitioner No.2, petitioner No.1
2025:JHHC:38181 2
is said to be father of petitioner No.2, Section 144 Cr.P.C. proceeding has also been initiated for the land in question as contained in Annexure-3 and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as aforesaid, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of their surrender / arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Pachamba P. S case No. 130 of 2024 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and
disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 19.12.2025 R.Kumar