APHC010585942007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1027/2007 Between: Chadalla Veera Venkata Satya Sivaji ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The petitioner and the second respondent, being represented by M.V.V.S.Subba Raju, are present. The learned trained mediator has submitted mediators report stating that the dispute in between the petitioner and the second respondent is settled amicably at the intervention of mediator and in the presence of learned counsels for both sides. The petitioner/accused paid an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- to the second respondent towards full and final settlement. A joint memo is filed by the learned counsels for both sides and also the petitioner and second respondent. An application is also filed to set aside the judgment of the learned Appellate Court, consequently the learned trial Court by compounding the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the petition, the I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed permitting the parties to compound the offence. As a result, the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.86 of 2006 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Amalapuram is set aside, consequently, the judgment in C.C.No.257 of 2003 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, East Godavari at Amalapuram is also set aside. 3. The petitioner and the second respondent volunteer that an amount of Rs.5,000/- each would be paid towards fee for the learned mediator. The same is recorded. Both are directed to pay accordingly. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 11.03.2025 sj 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1027 of 2007 Date: 11.03.2025 sj