APHC010585272017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 21894/2017 Between: 1. SHAIK IBRAHIM,, S/O. GHALIB AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. R/O. 2-204, PATHURU. PEDAKAKANI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522509. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A P STATE WAKF BOARD, TRANSIT OFFICE, HAJ HOUSE BUILDING, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A.P. STATE WAKF BOARD, 4TH FLOOR, IMDAD GHAR, NEAR KALESWAR RAO MARKET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ to declare the proceedings of the 1st respondent in restricting the right to participate in the auction going to be held on 05.07.2017 in pursuance to the Notification in F.No.105/GNT/2013/Z V, dated 19.06.2017 only to the mujawars as per the list prepared by the Tahsildar, Pedakakani Mandal, Guntur District in Rc.No.118/2007B, dated 12.04.2007 as illegal, discriminatory and unconstitutional and to direct the 1st respondent not to restrict the auction to the mujawars alone but to allow the participation without any restrictions, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 26941 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to the Notification in F.No.105/GNT/2013/Z V, dated 19.06.2017 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S ARIFULLAH (SC FOR AP WAQF BOARD) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 27.03.2025 TVN 242 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.21894 OF 2017 Date : 27.03.2025 TVN