Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36091 (AP)

Regulagadda Venkateswarlu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30158/2023 · 2025-04-02

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 30158 OF 2023 Between: Regulagadda Venkateswarlu, S/o late Naganna, age about 43 years Occ- Cultivation, R/o Dagguluru village, Palakole Mandal West Godavari District ...Petitioner AND T The State of Andhra Pradesh, , Rep. by its Principal Secretary Panchayathraj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi ’ Amaravath ^ t' > 2.,The District Collector (Panchayathraj wing)., West Godavari District at Bhimavaram. ✓ 3. The District Panchayath Officer, West Godavari District at Bhimavaram. 4: The Bhaggeswaram Gram Panchayath, Rep. by its Secretary ^ Bhaggeswara Village, Palakole Mandal, West Godavari District. 5. Koyye Lakshman Rao, S/o late Musalaiah, age about 53 years Occ- Cultivation, R/o D.No.2- 60, Baggeswaram Village, Palakole Mandal West Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 herein in not taking any action against the illegal construction of Church by the 5*^ respondent in the land in an extent of the circumstances stated be pleased to issue more Ac.0-03 cents i.e., 145 sq. yards in RS.No.17/3, nearD.No.1-58, situated at Baggeswara Village, H/o Polapalli Village, Palakole Mandal, West f Godavari District without obtaining any construction permission as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently I direct the respondents 1 to 4 to stop the construction of Church by the ^threspondent in the land in an extent of Ac.0-03 cents i.e., 145 sq.yards in j RS.No.17/3, near D.No.1-58, situated at Baggeswara Village, H/o Polapalli Village, Palakole Mandal, West Godavari District. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 forthwith to stop the illegal construction of Church by the 5^'^ respondent in the land in an extent of Ac.0-03 cents i.e., 145 sq. yards in RS.No.17/3, near D.No.1-58, situated at Baggeswara Village, H/o Polapalli Village, Palakole Mandal, West Godavari District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N.SRIHARI, SC for GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P. DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following order: .X 1 APHC010585492023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 30158/2023 Between: 1.REGULAGADDA VENKATESWARLU, S/0 LATE NAGANNA, AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/0 DAGGULURU VILLAGE, PALAKOLE MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATHRAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATH 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYATHRAJ WING, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM. 3.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM. 4.THE BHAGGESWARAM GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, BHAGGESWARA VILLAGE, PALAKOLE MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5.KOYYE LAKSHMAN RAO, S/0 LATE MUSALAIAH, AGE ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/0 D.N0.2- 60, BAGGESWARAM VILLAGE, PALAKOLE MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P0LISETTY RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFORPANCHAYATRAJ RURAL DEV 2.N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP 3.P DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: and GRAM PANCHAYAT) Sri Pohsetty Radha Krishna, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition Permission granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. on 2. as Sd/- A. VIJAYABABU ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Polisetty Radha Krishna, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri P. Durga Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri N. Srihari, SC for Gram Panchayat [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, SC for Gram Panchayat [OPUC] Andhra^Prades^h%'?TT^^^^* ^ High Court of 6. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:02/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.30158 of 2023 ANOS^ 5 0 2 APR 2025 Current Section DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS