Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3609 (PNJ)

ANJALI AND ORS. v. RAJINDER KUMAR AND ORS.

FAO/692/2009 · 2026-04-29

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 210 Anjali and Rajinder K CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU seeking en the learned dated 20.09 days in fili order sheet 29.10.2025 the last d representat appellants through the notice issue ‘no service FAO-692-2009 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.692 of 2 Date of decision li and others Versus nder Kumar and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellants. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present appeal has bee ing enhancement of compensation of earned Motor Accident Claims Trib 20.09.2008. The appeal is of the year 200 in filing the same. Notice has not r sheets from the last two consecutiv 0.2025 there was no representation o last date of hearing i.e. 29.10.20 sentation on behalf of any of the parti llants and fresh notices were also gh the Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) concer e issued to appellant No.1 has been re service report as Guardian/Grand M 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 92 of 2009 (O & M) cision :-29.04.2026 ….Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA s been filed by the claimants ion of Rs.2,62,000/- awarded by s Tribunal, Ambala vide Award ar 2009 filed with a delay of 32 s not been issued so far. As per secutive dates i.e.07.4.2025 and tion on behalf of appellants. On .10.2025 when there was no e parties, notice was issued to the also issued to the respondents concerned. As per office report, een received back with the report and Mother has died’. Notices VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document issued to a ‘died’. No back. parties wou pendency o than 17 yea no attempt engage a ne the instant an appropri reviving th April 29, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO-692-2009 (O & M) d to appellants No.2 and 3 also rece ’. Notices issued to respondents No. In the aforesaid premise, issua es would be a futile exercise. It appe ency of the present appeal before this years, the parties have lost interes ttempt has been made by them to co ge a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of th nstant appeal is disposed of, with libe propriate application within a period o ing the same, if so, advised. Copy of this order be sent to th Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 eceived back with the report ts No.1 and 2 have not received e, issuance of fresh notice to the t appears that due to sheer long e this Court for a period of more interest in pursuing the same, as to contact their counsel or to w of the foregoing circumstances, ith liberty to the parties, to move eriod of 06 weeks from today for nt to the parties. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document