COSMO CINEMA EARLIER VISHNU CINEMA v. P.C. KISHAN and ORS
WCP/981/2016 · 2025-01-23
Dinesh Mehta
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36089 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36089 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Writ Contempt No. 982/2016 Gurdev Singh S/o Shri Preetam Singh, R/o 22-Ps, Handa Colony, Raisinghnagar, District-Sri Gangangar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. P.c. Kishan, District Collector, Sri Gangangar
2. R.c. Choudhary,chief Engineer, Water Resources-North, Hanumangarh
3. Pradeep Rustagi, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Circle, District-Sri Ganganagar
4. Ram Rakh, Assistant Engineer, Water Resources, Sub Division, Raisinghnagar, District-Sri Gangangar
5. Kailash
Chandra,
Sub
Divisional
Magistrate, Raisinghnagar, District-Sri Ganganagar ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Writ Contempt No. 981/2016 Cosmo Cinema Earlier Vishnu Cinema, A Partnership Concern Cinema, Chak 22-Ps, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, R/o- Ward No. 7, House No. 262, Adarsh Colony, Anoopgarh, District- Sri Ganganagar ----Petitioner Versus
1. P.c. Kishan, District Collector, Sri Ganganagar
2. R.c. Choudhary, Chief Engineer, Water Resources - North, Hanumangarh
3. Pradeep Rustagi, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Circle, District- Sri Ganganagar
4. Ram Rakh, Assistant Engineer, Water Resources, Sub- Division, Raisinghnagar, District- Sri Ganganagar
5. Kailash
Chandra,
Sub
Divisional
Magistrate, Raisinghnagar, District- Sri Ganganagar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore, AAG assisted by Ms. Chelsi Agarwal
(2 of 2) [WCP-982/2016] JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 23/01/2025
1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that substantial period has since passed when the construction was raised by the respondents, despite finding that some high handedness has been shown by the respondents, this Court is not inclined to continue with the contempt petitions.
2. These contempt petitions are therefore, dismissed.
3. Notices of contempt petitions are hereby discharged.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 118-119-Arun/-