Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36089 (JHR)

CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/945/2025 · 2025-09-26

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30487 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 945 of 2025 1. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, aged 50 years, S/o Sri Sukdeo Prasad, resident of H.No. 269 ‘B’, Mohalla-Karnibag, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 2. Siya Ram Roy, aged 50 years, S/o Late Maheshwar Prasad Roy, resident of Village & PO-Ghorlas, PS Jasidih, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 3. Govind Yadav, aged 50 years, S/o Late Kiranı Yadav, resident of Village-Kadrasa, P.O. Bichchgarha, P.S.-Mohanpur (at present Rikiya), District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) 4. Nandan Sarkar, aged 35 years, S/o Late Gopal Sarkar, resident of H.No.306. Ward No. 04, Circular Road, Barmaiya, P.O., P.S. & District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Vishal Sagar, S/o not known to the petitioner, at present posted as the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O & P.S.-Deoghar, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Prakash Malakar, Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Priti Priyambada, Advocate --- 04/26th September 2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful and deliberate non-compliance of order dated 04.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 1291 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has submitted that a reasoned order has been passed as placed in the show cause dated 25.08.2025. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks adjournment. 2025:JHHC:30487 2 5. Considering the fact that the reasoned order has been passed in terms of order dated 04.04.2024 passed in W.P. (S) No. 1291 of 2023, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceeding, which is hereby dropped. 6. However, it will be open to the petitioners to take appropriate steps in connection with the reasoned order as may be permissible under law. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 26.09.2025 Mukul/-