IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No.1007 of 2025 ------ 1. Smt. Anuradha Chatterjee, wife of Late Subhash Chatterjee 2. Sri Kalipado Chatterjee, son of Late Dhanpati Chatterjee Both are residents of Ajanta Para, Hirapur, P.O. Dirapur, P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, both represented through their registered power of attorney holder, Bhola Sao, son of Sri Durga Sao, resident of Mohalla Shivam Colony, P.O. K.G. Ashram, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Aditya Ranjan, The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 3. Sri Vinod Kumar, The Additional Collector, Dhanbad, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 4. Sri Raviraj Sharma, The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Dhanbad, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 5. Sri Vikash Paliwal, The Circle Officer, Govindpur Circle, P.O. Govindpur, P.S. Govindpur, District Dhanbad .... .... .... Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, G.A. IV Mr. Bhanu Pratap, A.C. to G.A. IV ------ Order No.05 / Dated : 14.11.2025 It is pointed out that in order dated 07.11.2025 inadvertently in the second and fourth line, it has been wrongly typed ‘civil miscellaneous petition’, instead of ‘contempt case (civil)’. Let it be read as ‘contempt case (civil)’ at both places. It is further pointed out that name of petitioner no.2 is wrongly typed as Sri Kapildeo Chatterjee instead of ‘Sri Kalipado Chatterjee’. Let it be read as ‘Sri Kalipado Chatterjee’ Accordingly, order dated 07.11.2025 stands modified to the aforesaid extent only. Let this order be form part of order dated 07.11.2025. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit Uploaded 14.11.2025