HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19865 of 2008 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anubhav Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Ajaatshtru Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing of the charge-sheet dated 19.02.2008 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.5135 of 2008 (State Vs. Piyush Ranjan and others), arising out of Case Crime No.230 of 2007, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 419, 420 I.P.C. and Section 62, 63, 68 Copy Right Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Allahabad, pending in the court of CJM, Allahabad on the basis of compromise. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that dispute between the parties is of private and civil in nature. He further submits that during pendency of the application the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been entered into between the parties on 18.10.2024. In this regard, a compromise affidavit of both the parties has been annexed as Annexure No.1 of the second supplementary affidavit, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anubhav Trivedi, Satish Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Ajaatshtru Pandey Satish Chandra Agarwal And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court. 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 AS A482 No. 19865 of 2008 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad