Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36085 (CHH)

DEVENDRA KUMAR BAGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3817/2025 · 2025-07-21

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:34793 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3817 of 2025 1 - Devendra Kumar Baghel S/o Shri Sawant Singh Baghel Aged About 42 Years Occupation - Clerk Cum Incharge Paddy Procurement Center At Adim Jati Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Sarandi Regd No. 701,r/o Village Sarandi Police Station - Tadoki- Tahsil - Antagarh District - Kanker (C.G.) Mo. 8305894239 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Co- Operative Mahanadi Bhawan New Mantralaya Atal Nagar Raipur Police Station - Rakhi. Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co- Operative Marketing Federation Limited 6th Floor Tower-C, Commercial Complex Cbd, Sector 21, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipadan Sangh Maryadit Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Deputy Registrar Co- Operative Societies Kanker Tahsil And District Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Food Officer Collectorate Compound Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Branch Manager Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Branch Antagarh District Kanker (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, P.L. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate JYOTI JHA Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA 2 Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 22/07/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WP(C ) NO. 2651 of 2025 (Revaram Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others), therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of Revaram Sahu (supra). 2. Learned counsel for the respective respondents have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order of this Court in Revaram Sahu (supra). 4. A copy of the order passed in Revaram Sahu (supra) be placed in the record of the present writ petition. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti