2025:JHHC:26232 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 584 of 2025 ---------- 1. Prem Prasad Sah, aged about 60 years, son of Baijnath Sah, Resident of Rasikpur, P.O. & P.S.- Dumka, District-Dumka, Jharkhand. 2. Nawal Kishor Sah, aged about 56 years, son of Late Ganpat Sah, Resident of Kewatpara, P.O. & P.S.- Dumka, District-Dumka, Jharkhand. 3. Bindeshwari Manjhi, aged about 61 years, son of Laxman Manjhi, Resident of Kolhariya, P.O Rondhiya, P.S.-Sariyahat, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 4. Suresh Chandra Soren, aged about 53 years, son of Debison Soren, Resident of Mansanjor, PO Kaerabani Mission. PS- Masaliya, District- Dumka, Jharkhand 5. Bikesh Kumar Bhui, aged about 54 years, son of Late Shambhunath Bhui, Resident of Dudhani, PO & PS.-Dumka, District- Dumka. Jharkhand. 6. Dibin Marandi, aged about 52 years, son of Chando Marandi, Resident of Panjonpaharı, P.O Amlachater, PS Jama, District- Dumka, Jharkhand 7. Pradeep Kumar, aged about 62 years, son of Baikunath Prasad Bhandari, Resident of Hat Dumarıya, PO- Dumariya, P.S. Jaramundi, District- Dumka, Jharkhand 8. Krishna Deo Kumar, aged about 52 years, son of Bindeshwari Rabidas, Resident of Purana Dumka, P.O. & P.S.- Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 9. Sushil Murmu, aged about 54 years, son of Rajam Murmu, Resident of Charan Murmu, Resident of Phatepur, P.O. Nachangaria, P.S. Masaliya, District-Dumka, Jharkhand. 10. Seth Murmu, aged about 52 years, son of Rajam Murmu, Resident of Mairjatola, P.O. Guhiyajori, P.S.-Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 11. Braj Kishore Thakur, aged about 59 years, son of Deo Narayan Thakur, Resident of LIC Colony Gidhani Road, P.O. & P.S.- Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand 12. Ruplal Tudu, aged about 62 years, son of Late Hital Tudu, Resident of Asanbani, P.O. T.D. Dumaria, P.S.-Jama, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 13. Ramesh Prasad Sah, aged about 63 years, son of Late Laxmi Narayan Sah, Resident of Kumarpara, P.O. & P.S.-Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, 2. Sri. Anjaneyulu Dodde, Father’s name not known to the Petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman District 2025:JHHC:26232 2 Education Establishment Committee, Samaharnayal Bhawan, At, P.O & P.S.- Dumka, District-Dumka, Jharkhand. 3. Sri Ashish Hembrom, Father’s name not known to the Petitioners, The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, Samaharnayal Bhawan, At, P.O. & P.S.- Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. ………. Opp. Parties. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. M.K. Roy, GA-I Mr. Rishi Ranjan, AC to GA-I ---------- 04/ 29.08.2025 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that reasoned order has been passed in compliance of Writ Court’s order. 2. However, learned counsel for the petitioners is not satisfied with the reasoned order and submits that about Grade-3 nothing has been indicated in the reasoned order. Accordingly, the petitioners may be granted liberty to challenge the reasoned order. 3. In view of fair submissions of learned counsel for the parties, since the opposite parties have passed the reasoned order pursuant to filing of the representations by the petitioners, the instant contempt application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for by the petitioners. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-