Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36074 (HP)

ISHU KALYAN v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/20524/2025 · 2025-12-24

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20524 of 2025 Decided on: 24.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ishu Kalyan …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred representation dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2 for the redressal of his 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 grievances raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within a period of two weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Till the decision of the representation, the petitioner shall be permitted to work at her present place of posting i.e. at Zonal Hospital Dharamshala. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) December 24, 2025 Judge rohit