IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.881 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.11.1982 _______________________________________________________ Ravi Kumar …….Petitioner Versus R.D.Nazim & another … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the respondents-State. ___________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 10.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Director Transport, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of order dated 10.11.2025 passed by afore authority, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the afore submission of learned Deputy Advocate General that in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, petitioner Sh. Ravi Kumar(Traffic Inspector) has been re-instated vide order dated 10.11.2025. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly same are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 11, 2025 (shankar)