RAJ PAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CWP/7251/2023 · 2025-04-08
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36065 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36065 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7251-2023 Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 Rajpal and another
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik and Mr. Divyanshu Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that instant petition has rendered infructuous.
2.
Dismissed as infructuous. 08.04.2025
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No
Shivani Gupta 2025.04.08 17:46