Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36065 (CHH)

SAGAR AGRAWAL v. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWRE HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED

WPS/6280/2022 · 2025-07-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6280 of 2022 1. Sagar Agrawal S/o Shree Shambhoo Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Arya Nagar, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. Neeraj Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Yashwant Dewangan Aged About 29 Years R/o Neeraj Kunj, Ward No. 57, Katul Road, Ramji Yadav Gali, Hari Nagar, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Chhattisgarh State Powre Holding Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, Having Its Office At Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The General Manager (Hr) Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Having Its Office At Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited Through Its Managing Director Having Its Office At Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Vikas Gupta Aged About 28 Years Address Through The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Having Its Office At Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6. Ashutosh Tamrakar Aged About 26 Years Address - Through The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Having Its Office At Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Sudhandhu Upadhyay, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 29. 07.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of 2 this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive the prayer, if fresh cause of action arises in near future. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant