IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 19592/2025 Decided on: 11.12.2025 Gulshana Bibi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No1. Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikrant Chandel, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, respectively. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs: - “(a) That, appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner directing the respondents to rectify and correct the answer of question No.17 in the C series in 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 the answer key and also direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Constable (Female). (b) That respondent No.2 may be directed to redraw the final merit list for the post of Constable (Female), advertised vide advertisement dated 04.10.2024 and to reframed fresh final merit list.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances raised by the petitioner in this writ petition have already been redressed by respondent No.2-H.P. Public Service Commission, on the basis of which, Anmol Kumar Versus State of H.P. and others 2was decided. 4. In view of above, the present writ petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 11th December, 2025(rohit) 2 CWP No.17964 of 2025, decided on 25.11.2025