Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36058 (JHR)

GAJADHAR SAO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/49/2024 · 2025-12-09

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 49 of 2024 --------- Gajadhar Sao, aged 80 years, son of Late Bhokha Sahu, permanent r/o Village-Kumaran Kala, P.O. Kosaiadih, P.S. Tandwa, District- Chatra, retired from the post of Teacher Primary-cum-Upgraded Madhya Vidyalaya Bangwari Circle, P.O. Hewai, P.S. Keredari, District-Hazaribagh. ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sanjay Gupta, District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribag, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag. ....Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Priyadarshi, G.P.-VI --------- Through V.C. 15/Dated:- 09.12.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that pursuant to the Writ Court’s order, though the reasoned order has already been passed, but admitted dues has not yet been paid; accordingly, the instant application may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent that as per the reasoned order, the payment should be made to the petitioner. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid submission and after going through the reasoned order, it appears that the authorities have admitted that the petitioner is entitled for some benefits; however, the same has not yet been extended to him till date. 3. Accordingly, since no contempt is made out, the instant application is hereby disposed of by directing the concerned respondent to extend the monetary benefit, what they have admitted in the reasoned order, as early as possible preferably within a period of three weeks, as indicated in the Writ Court’s Order. (Deepak Roshan, J.) December 09, 2025 vikas/- uploaded 06.01.2026