SHUBHAM SHRIVASTAVA @ MONTI LALA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPHC/11/2025 · 2025-07-21
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36057 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36057 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:34769-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPHC No. 11 of 2025 Shubham Shrivastava @ Monti Lala S/o Ganesh Prasad Shrivastava, Aged About 23 Years R/o 46 Shriram Nagar Colony Barkherva Lakhimpur Khiri, Tahsil and Distt. - Lakhimpur (U.P.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Newai, District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent of Police, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.), Collectorate Premises Tahsil and Distt. Durg (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Gunjan Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble
Shri
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha, C.J.
22.07.2025 1 Heard Ms. Gunjan Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents. 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs :- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA
2
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the petitioner before this Hon'ble Court within stipulated period. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of habeas corpus to release the petitioner from illegal detention and petitioner is pledged to follow the order passed by this Hon'ble Court; 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may grant any other relief(s)/ order(s)/direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 3 Learned State counsel has pointed out that son of the petitioner is wanted in a criminal case for which an FIR has been registered as case Crime No. 156 of 2025 dated 30.05.2025 for the offence punishable under Section 318(4) of BNS and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 at Police Station, Newai, District – Durg (C.G.) and it stated that the petitioner’s son has been arrested from Lucknow and he is confined in Central Jail, Durg. 4 In view of the same, the present Habeas Corpus Petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
(Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice Chandra