APHC010585772024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3248/2024 Between: 1. KOTARU SAMRAJYA LAKSHMI @ SAMRAJYAM, . W/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. TULASI NAGAR, KANURU VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. SURAMPALLI MURALI KRISHNA, S/O PRASAD, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDERPRADESH 2. VANKAYALAPATI PULLA RAO, ( DIED) 3. VANKAYALAPATI JAGADEESH, S/O LATE PULLA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. AGRICULTURAL, R/O BODDURAI BAZAR, MUPPALLA VILLAGE, CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. VANKAYALAPATI GEETHA, ( DIED) 5. VANKAYALAPATI VENKATARAVAMMA, W/O LATE PULLA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O BODDURAI BAZAR, MUPPALLA VILLAGE, CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 6. KOTARU RAJESH, S/O RAMA SWAMY HUSBAND OF LATE VANKAYALAPATI GEETHA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O CHANDARLAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 7. KOTARU HARSHA NARAYANA, S/O RAJESH AND LATE VANKAYALAPATI GEETHA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O CHANDARLAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the returned Claim Petition in Unnumbered of 2023 in E.P.No.15 of 2017 in O.S.No.22 of 2015 on the file of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigama, NTR District IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to allow the Revision Petition directing the Hon’ble Lower Court to number the returned Claim Petition adjudicate the claim and decide the claim petition in favour of the Petitioner and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.15 of 2017, on the file of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, Nandigama, Krishna District till the disposal of the main Revision Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEMURU VP LAKSHMINARASIMHA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3248 of 2024 ORDER:- 1. The matter was listed on 25.06.2025, there was no representation. Again it was listed on 03.07.2025 and 11.07.2025, there was no representation. Today also there is no representation. 2. In that view of the same, it is clear that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the present revision petition. 3. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 18.07.2025 DR 230 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.3248 of 2024 Date 18.07.2025 DR