IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT FRIDAY. THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No,110 of 2025 RAO Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of below to disposal off the suit in I.A.No.2711 of 2023 in O.S.No.185 of 2023 on the file of Hon'ble Court of the Principal District Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Between: India, direct the court Sri Sadasivuni Ramanamurthy, S/o. Late Ramarao 70 years, R/o. Plot No. 1, D. No. Housing Society Layout, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam. Garu, Aged about 9-192, Sri Krishna Co-operative ...Petitioner/Plaintiff AND Sri Sadasivuni Sidhartha, S/o. S Vardaraju Garu, Aged about 32 years, R/o. Plot No. 48, Banjara Hills, Road No. Hyderabad-34. 3, Green Valley, Banjara Hills ...Respondent/Defendant Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. S Lakshmi Prameela Counsel for the Respondent : The Court made the following: none appeared APHC010585732024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY. THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 110/2Q2fi 050 0gifi [3206] RAO Between: Sadasivuni Ramanamurthy ...PETITIONER AND Sadasivuni Sidhartha Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent: ...RESPONDENT 1. The Court made the following Order: The petitioner herein, had approached the learned Judge, Visakhapatnam, by way of O.S.No.185 against registered deed of gift, dated 29.12.2018 and for Principal District of 2023, for a declaration cancellation of the same. Along with this Suit, the petitioner is said to have filed, I.A.No.2711 of 2023, for a permanent injunction restraining the respondent/defendant virtue of any sort of documents, for schedule property. This application has remained years. . by executing any document in the suit pending for the past 1 72 2 RRR,J C.R.P.No.llO of 2025 now approached this Court, seeking the said application for disposal in as much as the pending of the suit for 1 72 would prejudice the interest of the petitioner and have respondent alienating the property. / 2. The petitioner has years possibility of the 3. In view of the fact that the application has been pending and the case history produced by the petitioner does not show any consideration of the interim protection, it would be appropriate to dispose of this Civil Petition with a direction to the learned Principal District Judge. Visakhapatnam Revision to dispose of I.A.No.2711 of 2023 within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. The notice to the respondent is being waived in as much as the present order is only an order for early disposal and needless to passed only after an adequate opportunity and notice has been given to the respondent. say, orders would be 5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be order as to costs. no As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Ms. S Lakshmi Prameela, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies To TK sree *1 HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025 \ ORDER CRP.No.110 of 2025 5 01 APR 2025 •a to! * Current beciion . DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS