132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND MANI RAM AND OTHERS AWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate with Mr. Mohit Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, HARKESH MANUJA Learned that the respondents on 12.02.2024; at the time of disposal of the rev not raise any constructi the joint property and partition proceeding same. In view petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 01.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: MANI RAM AND OTHERS Versus AWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate with Mr. Mohit Nehra, Advocate for the Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions submits respondents shall be bound by the statement extended 4; at the time of disposal of the rev t raise any construction to the extent of 149 feet t property and even would not claim any n proceedings regarding the boundary wall existing over the In view of the aforesaid, no cause survives in and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1149-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 01, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate with Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate with Advocate for the respondents. for the respondents on instructions submits hall be bound by the statement extended by them 4; at the time of disposal of the revision petition and would on to the extent of 149 feet on frontal portion of even would not claim any preferential right in s regarding the boundary wall existing over the of the aforesaid, no cause survives in the present Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) , 2025 for the respondents on instructions submits by them ision petition and would frontal portion of right in s regarding the boundary wall existing over the present TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.01 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document