Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Laxmi Devi & ors. Vs. Brij Raj & ors. CMPs No.
30804 & 31999
of 2025 in
FAO No.
219
of 20
09
30.12.2025 Present: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicant/ respondent No.3. CMP No.
30804
of 2025
The instant application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been filed on behalf of the applicants/appellants No.3 & 4, namely Pradeep & Rajesh, for discharging their natural guardian/mother Laxmi Devi, i.e. respondent No.1, as they have attained the age of majority. 2. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavits of the applicants/appellants No.3 & 4 as well as taking into consideration the fact that they have now attained the age of majority, as is evident from the copies of their Matriculation examination, annexed with the application, the same is allowed and their natural guardian/mother Laxmi Devi, i.e. respondent No.1, is ordered to be discharged from their guardianship and the applicants/ appellants No.3 & 4 are permitted to pursue the case in their own capacity. 3. The application stands disposed of. CMP No.
31999
of 2025
4. The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been maintained by the applicants/appellants for release of
the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of the applicants/appellants. 5. As per the applicants, he is in dire need of money to meet out their day-to-day expenses. Therefore, it is prayed that the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest be released in their favour, as per their respective shares. 6. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non- applicant/Insurance Company and the learned counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance Company has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 26.02.2016, passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. 7. Heard.
Having perused the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavits of the applicants/appellants, coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest in favour of applicants/appellants, as per their respective shares in the total awarded amount of compensation, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to their respective bank
accounts, details whereof have been given in para-5 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge December 30, 2025 (V.Himalvi)