Crl.O.P.No.7524 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.7524 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.4831 of 2025 M/s.Vasan Healthcare Pvt Ltd., Rep By Mr.Vimal Chadrasekaran ... Petitioner Vs M/s.Trivitron Health Care P Ltd., (Trivitron Dignostics P Ltd., No.15, IVth Street, Abiramapuram, Chennai-600 018. Rep By Its Manager-Adiministration Mr.Rajagopal. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C/Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records and quash the proceedings in CC No.5233 of 2017 on the file of the Hon'ble Learned Metropolitan Magistrate (FTC-V), at Saidapet, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gautham Ram Vittal ORDER This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in CC No.5233 of 2017 on the file of the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate (FTC-V), at Saidapet, Chennai. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the p. 2 Crl.O.P.No.7524 of 2025 materials placed on record. 3. The petitioner is an accused in the complaint lodged by respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent is engaged in the business of importing medical equipments, diagnostics machineries and other allied products, spares and accessories from various countries and sell the same throughout the country. While being so, the petitioner is one of the regular customers of the respondent and approached for purchase of exchange kit, lasser head V4 x to V5.2 from the respondent under an invoice dated 26.09.2014 to the tune of Rs.42,10,089.00/-. The respondent had supplied the goods. However, so far, the petitioner failed to pay the amount even after repeated request made by the respondent. While being so, in order to discharge the said liability, the petitioner had issued cheque for a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- and the same was presented for encashment. However, it was returned for the reason “Funds Insufficient”. After causing statutory notice, the respondent filed a complaint. 4. The only ground raised by the petitioner is that now the Resolution Professional Plan has been approved, since the petitioner Company is under liquidation and the Director of the petitioner Company is ceased to be the p. 3 Crl.O.P.No.7524 of 2025 Director of the Company as per the order passed by the NCLT, Chennai. Therefore, the petitioner is not liable to be punished and seeks for quashment of the complaint. 5. Admittedly, the resolution plan was approved only in the year 2023. The complaint is of the year 2017. Therefore, this Court finds no grounds to quash the complaint in CC No.5233 of 2017 on the file of the Hon'ble Learned Metropolitan Magistrate (FTC-V), at Saidapet, Chennai. The Trial Court is directed to complete the trial in C.C.No.5233 of 2017, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. 14.03.2025 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn p. 4 Crl.O.P.No.7524 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate (FTC-V), at Saidapet, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.7524 of 2025 14.03.2025