Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36040 (RAJ)

GHAMA RAM VISHNOI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1397/2025 · 2025-01-23

Arun Monga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JD:4328] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1397/2025 Ghama Ram Vishnoi S/o Bhera Ram Ji, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Malawara Post Parawa, Jalore, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Sanskrit Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Vishnoi. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order(Oral) 23/01/2025 1. Petitioner herein is before this Court seeking directions to the respondents to accord him posting on a vacant post of Sr. Teacher (Hindi) at Government Praveshika Sanskrit School, Lal Bhakri Leta, District Jalore, or to post him near the place where his wife is working. 2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has also filed a representation dated 19.10.2024 (Annex.7) before the competent authority of the respondents for mitigation of his grievance, and he is sanguine that, in case his representation is taken up on the administrative side, it will receive favorable treatment. Therefore, the competent authority may decide the same as per the applicable transfer policy / guidelines of the State within a reasonable time. [2025:RJ-JD:4328] (2 of 2) [CW-1397/2025] 3. Without commenting on the merits of case, in view of the aforesaid submission, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the pending representation filed by the petitioner objectively, as expeditiously as possible, as per the applicable transfer policy / guidelines of the State. It would be appreciated of the Competent Authority if the extenuating circumstances, which have been enumerated in the petition herein, are gone into before passing the order and after verification, if found to be genuine, then appropriate order be passed on humanitarian grounds. 4. It is made clear that the direction to consider the representation shall not be construed as an opinion on merits of the case, in any manner. 5. Disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 40-/Jitender/love Whether fit for reporting : Yes / No.