Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 3604 (RAJ)
SMT. RAJKUMRI THOLIA W/O SHRI SUNIL KUMAR THOLIA v. PUSHPANJALI SINGH D/O SHRI CHATRARAM JAT
CW/594/2025 · 2025-01-17
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3604 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3604 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2375] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 594/2025
1. Smt. Rajkumri Tholia W/o Shri Sunil Kumar Tholia, Aged About 59 Years, For And Through Director Herself Unipoint Creasons Private Limited Company, Tholia Building, M.i. Road, Jaipur Rajasthan
2. Sunil Kumar Tholia S/o Shri Nem Kumar Tholia, Aged About 66 Years, (Director) Unipoint Creasons Private Limited, Tholia Building, M.i. Road, Jaipur Rajasthan And Authorized Representative (For Legal Proceedings) Unipoint Creasons Private Limited Company Tholia Building, M.i. Road, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. Pushpanjali Singh D/o Shri Chatraram Jat, R/o Plot No.a- 213, Dashrath Marg, Hanuman Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur
2. Smt. Ganga Devi W/o Shri Kalyan Sahai Meena, R/o Upali Dhani, Vilalge Chitanukalan, Tehsil Amer District Jaipur
3. Rajulal Meena S/o Sewanath Meena, R/o Plot No.a-213, Dashrath Marg, Hanuman Nagar, Vaishali Nagar Jaipur
4. Banwari Gurjar S/o Shri Gullaram, R/o Village Ghatwada, Tehsil Amer District Jaipur
5. Asam Jat S/o Not Known, R/o Kanwarpura, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur
6. Banwari Jat S/o Not Known, R/o Village Manpura Machedi, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur
7. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector Office Collectorate Building, Banipark, Jaipur Rajasthan
8. Tehsildar Amer, Office Tehsil Amer District Jaipur
9. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural, Office Near Railway Station Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Bhagwati, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
[2025:RJ-JP:2375] (2 of 2) [CW-594/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 17/01/2025 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the Civil Writ Petition. Therefore, the Civil Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /6