Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3604 (GAU)

UTTAM BRAHMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS

WP(C)/347/2025 · 2026-07-19

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010011922025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/347/2025 UTTAM BRAHMA S/O- LATE PRABHAT CHANDRA BRAHMA, R/O- VILL- BANYAGURI, P.O.- RUPSHI, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM, PIN- 783331 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HANDLOOM, TEXTILES AND SERICULTURE, GUWAHATI-22 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:THE DIRECTOR OF SERICULTURE ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 7:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY SERICULTURE DEPARTMENT BODOFANAGAR KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783370 8:THE DIRECTOR SERICULTURE DEPARTMENT BTC BODOFANAGAR KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783370 9:THE ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF SERICULTURE KOKRAJHAR BODOFANAGAR KOKRAJHAR DIST- KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783370 10:THE TREASURY OFFICER KOKRAJHAR DIST.- KOKRAJHAR (ASSAM) PIN- 78337 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI, MR G SARMA,MS. D. DEVI,MS CHITRALEKHA DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SERICULTURE, SC, FINANCE DEPTT.,SC, BTC,SC, AG (A AND E),GA, ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 20/07/2026 Heard Mr. K R Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R Boro, learned Standing counsel, Accountant General, Assam and Mr. B Bora, learned Standing counsel, BTC. Mr. K R Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the life time arrears with regard to the pension receivable by the parents of the petitioner, has since been authorized to him. Accordingly, Mr. Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant