1 / 3 2025:CGHC:2401-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 19 of 2025 Ku. Sonam Lakra D/o Agastus Lakra Aged About 27 Years R/o Village- Sajbahar, Post-Tapkara, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Inspector General Of Police Ambikapur Range, District- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - The Station House Officer Police Station, Tapkara, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - Shivmangal Sai Posted As Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Sajbahar, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 7 - Ankit Jaiswal Ward Panch, Gram Panchayat, Sajbahar, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 15/01/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby directing the respondent authorities to register the FIR against the respondents no. 6 & 7 on the written complaint filed by the petitioner disclosing cognizable offence, forthwith, in accordance with law. (ii) To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite several complaints have been made no action has been taken by the State respondents. 3. We have perused the prayers and pleadings made in the writ petition. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the Court below by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. (now, under Section 175(3) or under Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023). He further submits that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been 3 / 3 decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ved