Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36038 (AP)

Alikana Jagan Mohana Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/35302/2022 · 2025-01-10

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010583642022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 35302/2022 Between: 1. ALIKANA JAGAN MOHANA RAO, S/O. LATE CHINNA RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O.KALIGAM VILLAGE, KOTHURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM, 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDA REVENUE DIVISION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTHURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. GUNTA MINNA RAO, S/O. CHINNODU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.METTURU VILLAGE, KOTHURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 7. ALIKANA VARALAKSHMI, W/O. LATE RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.METTURU VILLAGE, KOTHURU MANDAL, 2 SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 8. DUKKA JOGAMMA, W/O. LATE GUNNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.METTURU VILLAGE, KOTHURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 9. DUKKA TULASAMMA, W/O. LATE APPAYYA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.METTURU VILLAGE, KOTHURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 10. DUKKA SUNDARAMMA, W/O. LATE VENKATI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.METTURU VILLAGE, KOTHURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri K. Sazid, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 10.01.2025 Vns