IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211-I RSA-1545-1998 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2025 Chhoto …Appellant V/s Kaila and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate, for the appellant. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) As per the report of the Registry, notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report that he has expired. 2. On account of the demise of the appellant, it was primarily the duty of the legal representatives of the appellant to get themselves impleaded in the present lis. As they have not come forward, it appears that they may not be interested in pursuing the present appeal. 3. That being so, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the legal representatives of the appellant to move an appropriate application for revival of the appeal in case they are interested in pursuing the same. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE May 05, 2025 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2025.05.06 15.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document