Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36031 (RAJ)

DR. MARIYAM MEHAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1386/2025 · 2025-01-23

Arun Monga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JD:4323] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1386/2025 Dr. Mariyam Mehar W/o Rashid Ahmed Mehar, D/o Ridmal Khan Mehar, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Gomat, Tehsil Pokran, District Jaisalmer (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Director (Public Health), Directorate Of Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Behind Secretariat, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). Email Address- Directorph-Rj@nic.in 2. District Collector, Jaisalmer Having Its Office At Collectorate Premises, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer (Raj.) Email Address- Dm.jai.rj@nic.in 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer (Cmho), Jaisalmer Having Its Office At Dedansar Road, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer. Email Address- Cmho.jai.rj@nic.in ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manas Khatri. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order(Oral) 23/01/2025 1. Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks directions to the respondents to assign the place of posting at CHC Sankra and CHC Ramgarh for the post of Medical Officer (Dental) on an Urgent Temporary Basis (UTB). 2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order/judgment of this Court rendered in Shruti Moyal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ [2025:RJ-JD:4323] (2 of 2) [CW-1386/2025] Petition No.12243/2024. He submits that the petitioner is sanguine that if the respondents consider the representation/email dated 31.12.2024 (Annex.7) of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment, she will be meted out with favorable treatment. 3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the pending representation/Email filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Shruti Moyal (supra). 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 35-/Jitender//- Whether fit for reporting : Yes / No.