Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36031 (CAL)

THE D.I. OF SCHOOLS S.E. HOOGHLY v. MAHADEB BHATTACHARYA AND ORS

RVW/222/2024 · 2025-07-11

Rai Chattopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01.08.2025 court no. 652 serial no. 07 kaushik CPAN 1258 OF 2024 in RVW 222 of 2024 CAN 1 of 2024, CAN 2 of 2024 in WPA 22118 of 2023 Mahadeb Bhattacharya Vs. Mr. Mrinmoy Ghosh & Ors. Mr. Asim Hati Ms. Nandini Sharma Mr. Antariksha Sharma … … for the Petitioner Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya Mr. Joydip Banerjee … … for contemnor Mr. Joydip Banerjee Ms. Mousumi Banerjee … … for petitioner in RVW 222 of 2024 During pendency of the contempt application being CPAN 1258 of 2024 and at the stage when the order under contempt has been admittedly partly complied with by the alleged contemnor, the alleged contemnor has come up with the review application as regards the said order of this Court dated May 9, 2024, being RVW No. 222 of 2024. The affidavit-in-opposition to the review application being RVW 222 of 2024, is filed today in Court. Let the same be kept with the record. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the review applicant has sought leave to file affidavit-in-reply to the same. Let the affidavit-in-reply be filed within a period of two weeks from date. 2 Let this matter be adjourned for two weeks and listed on the next date of sitting of this Court after two weeks. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)