Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3603 (AP)

RUNJULA SUBHAKARA RAO, v. THE STATE OF A.P. REP., BY ITS PP

CRLRC/2414/2011 · 2025-07-31

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010018732011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2414 OF 2011 Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C, aggrieved by the Judgment in Criminal Appeal No.43 of 2009, on the file of Hon'ble Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Gudivada in SC.No.256 of 2008 dated 23-11-2011. Between: Runjula Subhakara Rao, S/o. Ajaraiah, Aged 49 years, R/o. Mulakalapalli Village, Mudinepalli Mandal, Machilipatnam. ...Petitioner/Accused AND The State of A.P, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A Dattanand Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order: APHC010018732011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] alW FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO; 2414/2011 Between; 1.RUNJULA SUBHAKARA RAO MULAKALAPALLI VILLAGE, MACHILIPATNAM. S/0. AJARAIAH, R/0. MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, j 1 ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF A P REP BY ITS PP, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the Judgment in Criminal Appeal No.43 of 2009, on the file of Hon'ble Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Gudivada in SC.No.256 of 2008 dated 23-11-2011 and acquit the Revision Petitioner/Accused in the interest of justice. lA NO; 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP 3648 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of the sentence against the petitioner in Criminal Appeal No.43 of 2009, on the file of Hon'ble Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Gudivada dated 23-11-2011, pending the Revision and grant him Bail interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 181 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence and release the petitioner on bail against the Order passed in Crl.A,No.43 of 2009 on the file of Hon'ble Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Gudivada, dated 23-11-2011, Crl.R.C.No.2414 of 2011 before this Hon'ble High Court, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 1349 OF 2012 pending Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to kindly suspend the sentence and release the petitioner on bail against the order passed in Crl.A.No.43 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Gudiwada, Krishna District, dt.23-11-2011 pending Crl.R.C.No.2414 of 2011, before this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice. !A NO: 3 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 1350 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the registry to receive the document as Addl. Material papers filed herewith. Counsel for the Petitioner: i.ad)^tanand Counsel for the Respondent: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) the honourable SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2414 of 2011 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner/accused. Report received from Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram. In the report, it is submitted that the accused completed his sentence and accordingly, he was released from the prison on 30.03.2017 and to that effect, the conviction warrant was also submitted to the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gudivada 2. vide letter dated 18.05.2017. In view of the petitioner having undergone the sentence imposed by the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gudivada, and as the petitioner has not been appearing before the Court to pursue the revision, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous, since the sentence imposed hiis already been undergone. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. 3. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU I DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional District and Sessions Judge (with records if any) 2. The Assistant Sessions Judge, Gudivada Gudivada, Krishna district Krishna district %' 3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, District 4. The Inspector of Police, Mudinepalli Police District 5. One CC to Sri. A Dattanand Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, Amaravathi [OUT] 7. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi 8. Two CD Copies Rajahmundry, East Godavari Station, East Godavari High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Pradesh at Stu nm high court DATED: 01/08/2025 JUDGMENT CRLRC NO. 2414 OF 2011 I disposing of the CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS