Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36029 (JHR)

BABLU KUMAR RAVANI ALLIAS MANI SHANKAR PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4520/2025 · 2025-09-26

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:30602 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 4520 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4520 of 2025 Bablu Kumar Ravani, aged about 34 years, son of Manoj Rawani, resident of Village- Shitala, P.O. & P.S. Gandey, District- Giridih … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mani Shankar Prasad @ Mani Shankar Prasad, son of Hari Shankar Prasad @ Hari Shankar Prasad, resident of Near Durga Mandir, Adarsh Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Hirapur, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. ----- 07/26.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Daru P.S. Case No.134 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations are made against the petitioner of investment of money taken from the innocent person in the company, namely, Swing Trading Company, which is a 100 Crore company. He further submits that the petitioner has also invested in that company and in course of travelling from one place to another, the petitioner’s enquiry was made by the informant where he used to invest the amount and he has only informed the same to the informant and pursuant to that, he has invested the amount in the said company. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of inducing the informant to invest the ( 2025:JHHC:30602 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 4520 of 2025 amount in the said company. 5. It has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge that the petitioner is also the victim and he has also invested the amount in the said company and it has been pointed out that no amount has been credited in the account of the petitioner and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Daru P.S. Case No.134 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 26th September, 2025 Ajay/