Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36026 (RAJ)

INDER PAL SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/794/2024 · 2025-02-19

Pushpendra Singh Bhati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2024:RJ-JD:5547] (1 of 2) [CW-794/2024] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 794/2024 Inder Pal Singh S/o Sh. Harbhajan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o- Bath, Jalandhar (Punjab). At Present Posting At- Hq 141 Dmc/49 Brtf/chetak (Gref) C/o 56 Apo, Sadhuvali, District-Sri Ganganagar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Ministry Of Defence (Br), Govt. Of India, B Wing, 4Th Floor, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi-110010. 2. The Director, Seema Sadak Bhawan, Ring Road, Naraina, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi-110010. 3. The Officer Incharge Bro- Record/gref-Record, Dighi Camp-Pune (Maharashtra)-411015. 4. The Additional Director General, Border Road (North West) Sector 48-C, Chandigarh Pin-160047. 5. The Chief Engineer, Hq Chetak Project C/o 56 Apo, Bikaner (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Saluja For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy. SG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order 02/02/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to the medical report, which is at page no.42 of the pleadings, which contained a specific recommendation to the effect of the petitioner being unfit for his posting at a place of high-altitude, which in the present case is 9000-15000 feet. [2024:RJ-JD:5547] (2 of 2) [CW-794/2024] Learned counsel for the respondent seeks short time to respond to this. List the matter on 05.02.2024. (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J. 152-Sudheer/-