Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36024 (PNJ)

JAIPREET SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/9697/2021 · 2025-05-20

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No. 9697 of 2021 (O&M) and other connected cases 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (Sr. No. 240) (1) CWP No. 9697 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.05.2025 Jaipreet Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents (2) CWP No. 9754 of 2021 (O&M) Shubham Goyal and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents (3) CWP No. 11839 of 2021 (O&M) Kunal Sharma and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents (4) CWP No. 10907 of 2021 (O&M) Mannat Dhull ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents (5) CWP No. 11368 of 2021 (O&M) Lipsa Sharma and others Kanchan 2025.05.21 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP No. 9697 of 2021 (O&M) and other connected cases 2 ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents (6) CWP No. 12844 of 2021 (O&M) Gurmandeep Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents (7) CWP No. 19637 of 2021 (O&M) Lovinder Singh Maan ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate for respondent No. 4 in CWP-12844-2021 and CWP-10907-2021. Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for respondent No. 7. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) 1. In the present petitions, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is that they should be allowed to apply for selection and appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) and grant them the benefit Kanchan 2025.05.21 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP No. 9697 of 2021 (O&M) and other connected cases 3 of the reduced application-cum-examination fee by reopening the application window. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the selection process has already been finalized and the appointments have already been made. 3. Probably, keeping in view the said fact, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner(s) to press the present petitions as the selection has already been finalized and the selected candidates have been appointed. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected cases. May 20, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No Kanchan 2025.05.21 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment