Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36022 (AP)

Putla Nava Chaitanya, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/9395/2024 · 2025-01-06

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

. ..I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9395 OF 2024 Bet`^,ee n : `S iJ=;prffe 1. Putla Nava Chaitanya, S/o. Putla Babu Rao, Aged about 29 years, R/o. D.No.18-9-23C, S.C Colony, 23 Ward, Ponnur, Nidubrolu Old Town, Guntur District. 2. Shaik Shaifulla, S/o. Shaik Yasin, Aged about 34 years, R/o. D.No.15-10-8, Ward No.20, SPP Road, Ponur, Guntur District. ...Petitioners/Accused No.6 & 14 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Amaravathi rep by Ponnur Police Station, Guntur District. ...Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C and Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/s on anticipatory bail in cr.No.10 of 2020 on the file of the Ponnur Police Station, Guntur District in the event of their arrest; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds and upon hearing the arguments of sri Sudharsana Reddy.J, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent; THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY gBEMERA±J2EI±I±QD!n!Qj939|QE2Q2i QBIPEB± The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, ®ls filed on behalf of the Petitioners here'ln/A6 and A14 to grant antiCiPatOry ba" in connection with crime No,10 of 2020 of Ponnur Rural Pol'lce station, Guntur District, registered for the OffenCeS Punishable under sections 120B, 153A, 153, 354D, 354A(3), 467, 468, 505(2), 509 read with 34 lPC and Sections 67 and 67A of the I.T. Act. 2. Brief facts Of the Case are that On 22.01.2020, the defaCtO complainant filed a report before the police stating that on 19.01.2020 there Was a newspaper Cl'lPPing in a daily newspaper with certain impl-[cit allegations aga-lnst her daughter. pursuant to the sa|ld clipping, certain posts were allegedly posted and forwarded in some whatsapp groups & soc-lal Media Platforms along With personal pictures of her daughter. 3. Heard. PerusedthereCOrd. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor Submitted that earlier, 2nd petitioner/A14 has filed antiCiPatOry bail aPPl'lCatiOn before this court and the same was allowed vide Orders in Crl.P.No.9512 of 2024, and without Verifying the Sa-Id fact, 2nd pet-ltiOner/A14 filed the present bail appl'lcation through the present counsel. 5. By an order, dated 31.12.2024, '[n CrI.P.No.8583 of2024, this court granted anticipatory bail to some of the accused in the present + '> '\``\ crlme and the case of lst petjtllOner herel'n/A6 also stands on the same footI'ng as that of the petjtl'oners therein. 6. ln view of the aforesaI|d facts and circumstances, thl's couft I'S inclI'ned to grant antI-CI'PatOry ba" to 1 St petI-tI-Oner/A6. 7. Accordl'ngly, jn the event of hls arrest,1St petI'tI'Oner/A6 shaH be released on ba" on hls executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) wI'th two sureties each for the 'jke sum each to the satISfactlon of the arrestlng police officl-als, and also on condI'tl'On that the petjtIOner/A6 sha" make hlmself aval''able for investlgatlon as and when required and that he sha" not cause any threat, Inducement or prom,se to the prosecution wI'tnesses The petltl'oner/A6 sha" appear before the statlon House officer concerned once ln a week I e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and o1.00 p.m., tl'll fill'ng of the charge sheet. 8. Accordl-ngly, the crimI'na' Petition l's partly a"owed. 9^D_J-. ap| s RINIVAS lgr;ffi,i+Z _-`.-'IVnO TRUE COPY,i_ ASsS:ScTT:oN:z:,:fa¥ETR:AR ccs to public prosecutor, H1'gh Court ofAP [OUT] spare copy oa) L36= To, 1. The stall-on House officer, ponnur poII'Ce Station, Guntur Djstrl'ct. 2. One CC to sri. sudharsana Reddy.J, Advocate [opuc] a T..I_ -- . _ _ cr)t= HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED..06/01/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.9395 of 2O24 PARTLY ALLOWED