1 2025:CGHC:40830 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8389 of 2025 1 - Prabha Sahu W/o Late Shankar Sahu Aged About 40 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School, Khorsi, Block Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate of Public Instructions (DPI) Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director, School Education Division, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Education Officer, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Jainab Vanak, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 13-08-2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P/1), whereby the petitioner who is Assistant Teacher (LB) has been transferred from Govt. Primary School, Khorsi, Block Arang to Govt. Primary School Dumha, Block Arang under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 order was passed after declaring her surplus. The petitioner has moved her representation on 12.06.2025 to the authority concerned, but her representation has not been considered till date. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has joined at her transferred place of posting. He would further submit that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil