- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13338 WP No. 32485 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 32485 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KUMARSWAMY S/O LATE CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/ONO. 499, D-90, BIDARA KRISHNAPPA ROAD DEVARAJA MOHALLA MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGOY T.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE STATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3RD FLOOR TTMC A BLOCK K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BANGALORE 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 3. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MYSURU MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT 570 001 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13338 WP No. 32485 of 2024 4. DEPTUY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MYSURU MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 001 5. MYSURU AND CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE WHOLESALE MARKETING SOCIETIES LTD NO. 66, JAMBOO BAZAR JANATHA BAZAR MYSURU - 570 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR THE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1, R3 AND R4 SRI. T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (VAKALATH NOT FILED) SRI. K. ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 SRI. SAMPATH ANAND SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R5 (VAKALATH NOT FILED)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 23.10.2024 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-C, GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO APPOINT THE ADMINISTRATOR TO THE R-5 SOCIETY AS PER SECTION 28-A(5) OF KARNATAKA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13338 WP No. 32485 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs: "(a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 23.10.2024 given by the petitioner vide Annexure-C. (b) Such other writ or order as direction as deemed fit as circumstances of the case including an order for Costs." 2. Sri.Rajendra Kumar Sungay T.P., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the above petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0